Gast
2004-01-11, 13:08:42
Zitiere:
The GeForce FX 5900 XT is no doubt a very fast, very affordable graphics option for enthusiasts and gamers on a budget, and right now I'd recommend it over the Radeon 9600 XT. However, I have some concerns about NVIDIA's lack of driver support for floating point texture formats, which could become a more important issue as more DirectX 9 titles come to market. Adding support for floating point texture formats apparently hasn't been a priority for NVIDIA's driver team, but it should be. Perhaps NVIDIA could take some time away from optimizing for 3DMark03 and dedicate more software engineers to floating point texture support.
Vor allem dies ist ja interessant:
[quotre]Adding support for floating point texture formats apparently hasn't been a priority for NVIDIA's driver team, but it should be. [/quote]
Wieviel Reserven 'schlummern' denn da noch... ? =)
Quelle:
Tech-Report (http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2003q4/geforcefx-5900xt/index.x?pg=14)
up
The GeForce FX 5900 XT is no doubt a very fast, very affordable graphics option for enthusiasts and gamers on a budget, and right now I'd recommend it over the Radeon 9600 XT. However, I have some concerns about NVIDIA's lack of driver support for floating point texture formats, which could become a more important issue as more DirectX 9 titles come to market. Adding support for floating point texture formats apparently hasn't been a priority for NVIDIA's driver team, but it should be. Perhaps NVIDIA could take some time away from optimizing for 3DMark03 and dedicate more software engineers to floating point texture support.
Vor allem dies ist ja interessant:
[quotre]Adding support for floating point texture formats apparently hasn't been a priority for NVIDIA's driver team, but it should be. [/quote]
Wieviel Reserven 'schlummern' denn da noch... ? =)
Quelle:
Tech-Report (http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2003q4/geforcefx-5900xt/index.x?pg=14)
up