PDA

Archiv verlassen und diese Seite im Standarddesign anzeigen : Far Cry Benchmark v1.0 (Tool)


misterh
2004-07-21, 07:07:37
ja habe grad von da (http://www.hardwareoc.hu/index.php/p/news/cid/3/y/5851.html) erfahren. Aber leider geht Download noch nicht. Vielleicht hat schon jmd von euch runterladen können?`

Ich hoffe dass es heut noch klappt mit download.

P.S.: Denke mal nicht, dass ihr davon schon gewusst habt?

Edit:

Hier (ftp://hoc:hoc@www.jatekok.hu//hardwareoc/HardwareOC_Far_Cry_Benchmark/HOC_FCBench.zip) könnt ihr runterladen.

Edit2:

Problem gefunden wie ihr am besten machen sollt.

One Find:
automatisch oder manuell ordner angeben "FarCry.exe"

two choose:
3 Ordner ins Level kopieren "HOC, PCGH und TR"

three set1:
auflösung auswählen und eigene cfg auswählen.
dann da, falls ihr wollt, display auf 1 und rendermode anpassen.

four set2:
eure auswahl

five more:
auch eure auswahl

general:
müsst ihr nicht

Gast
2004-07-21, 08:12:47
Na Prima nocch ein unsciherheitsfaktor bei FC mehr... :down:

misterh
2004-07-21, 08:17:45
jaja schon klar. hat noch viel bug.
zb dass es jedesmal cfg ändert und manchmal auch fehlermeldung kommt, wenn man starten will usw...

misterh
2004-07-23, 09:25:03
Es gibt jetzt 1.1 version :D

-----------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 640×480
Custom quality option, renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 122,90 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 136,09 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 129,49 FPS


-----------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 800×600
Custom quality option, renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 122,99 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 135,59 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 129,28 FPS


-----------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1024×768
Custom quality option, renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 116,60 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 126,91 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 121,75 FPS


-----------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1280×1024
Custom quality option, renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 85,51 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 90,75 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 88,13 FPS


-----------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1600×1200
Custom quality option, renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 65,25 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 68,56 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 66,90 FPS


-----------------------------------------------------------

Gast
2004-07-23, 10:41:35
Wie kann man das Tool starten, damit es SM2.0b verwendet?

misterh
2004-07-23, 10:55:01
Original geschrieben von Gast
Wie kann man das Tool starten, damit es SM2.0b verwendet?

glaube nicht, denke mal bei 1.2 version sollte diese möglich sein.

Edit: 1.2 ist draussen, ich schau mir mal an.

Psycho2200
2004-07-23, 13:57:04
T-Bred @2300Mhz
2x 512MB DDR400 2-3-3-11
X800 Pro @ XT



Resolution: 640×480
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 87,12 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 89,77 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 88,44 FPS


Resolution: 800×600
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 87,05 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 89,42 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 88,23 FPS


Resolution: 1024×768
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 86,93 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 89,34 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 88,13 FPS


Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 79,94 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 82,84 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 81,38 FPS


Resolution: 1600×1200
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 79,80 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 82,51 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 81,15 FPS

Morpheus2200
2004-07-23, 20:39:10
XP 2600mhz 9700pro@400/360


Resolution: 640×480
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 104,29 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 111,59 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 107,94 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 800×600
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 90,16 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 92,27 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 91,21 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1024×768
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 61,68 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 62,42 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 62,04 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 61,70 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 62,46 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 62,08 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1600×1200
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 61,59 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 62,53 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 62,06 FPS

Psycho2200
2004-07-23, 20:52:49
T-Bred @2300Mhz
2x 512MB DDR400 2-3-3-11
X800 Pro @ XT

6AA / 16AF

Resolution: 640×480
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 89,07 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 91,48 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 90,27 FPS


Resolution: 800×600
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 88,45 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 90,96 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 89,70 FPS


Resolution: 1024×768
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 82,20 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 85,63 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 83,91 FPS


Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 81,17 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 84,20 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 82,68 FPS


Resolution: 1600×1200
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 81,34 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 84,19 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 82,76 FPS

Morpheus2200
2004-07-23, 20:54:35
XP 2600mhz 9700pro@400/360
6AA/16AF

Resolution: 640×480
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 92,76 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 95,86 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 94,30 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 800×600
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 66,95 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 67,86 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 67,40 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1024×768
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 44,62 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 44,95 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 44,78 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1280×1024
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 44,84 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 45,20 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 45,02 FPS


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resolution: 1600×1200
Maximum quality option, Direct3D renderer
Level: Research, demo: Research.tmd

Score = 44,64 FPS (Run 1)
Score = 44,98 FPS (Run 2)
Average score = 44,81 FPS

Morpheus2200
2004-07-23, 21:02:18
Also ich würd sagen den Test kann mann getrost vergessen ;)

BvB123
2004-07-24, 10:17:13
Warum?